Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
Research ArticlePolicy Forum

Neonatal and Early Infant Development

Melissa R. Johnson and James M. Helm
North Carolina Medical Journal January 2020, 81 (1) 46-47; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.81.1.46
Melissa R. Johnson
fellow, NC Child, Raleigh, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: melrobj@gmail.com
James M. Helm
infant and family specialist, WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

As North Carolina continues to work toward improved medical access and care for all to reduce mortality and morbidity, it is important to support those who are especially vulnerable, in particular children born prematurely or those exposed to early trauma and other adverse experiences.

The prematurity rate in North Carolina in 2018 was 10.5% [1]. Advances in medical care have saved many lives in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and families are grateful as they ask, “How will he or she do?” While providing life-saving care, the neonatal care system also has a responsibility to support long-term outcomes in all developmental domains, including social-emotional health, as this population is at greater risk of lifelong developmental challenges.

Infant brains develop and organize rapidly while in NICUs and are profoundly influenced by the environment and experience [2]. There is a mismatch of “expected” stimulation within the womb and that which is received in the NICU. The best medical care needs to be neuro-protective and address this discrepancy.

Research confirms the importance of keeping mothers and infants together. There are developmental and preventive advantages from mother's milk and the close physical contact of skin-to-skin holding, which also supports parent healing and strengthens parental bonds [3, 4].

All experiences that infants have in NICUs impact their brains. Both the sensory and the emotional/psychological environments are critical. Bright lights, loud noises, pain, and lack of human contact all can interfere with restful sleep and maturing abilities to process the world, which are critical for healing, growing, organization of sleep-wake states, and other developmental tasks of the brain. While most NICUs have programs that address developmental and family needs, few report comprehensive programs [5].

An example of a program that shows long-term benefits is the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) (www.NIDCAP.org) [6]. It is comprehensive, system wide, and family centered with demonstrated short- and long-term developmental benefits [7, 8]. NIDCAP's Nursery Assessment Manual helps NICUs self-assess their environment, care for infants and families, and support staff toward providing highly attuned developmental care [9].

In all programs that grow and evolve, vigilance is required to prevent program erosion as information is gained and there is staff turnover. As with neonatal development, the field of infant mental health continues to evolve. Its foundation is the work of pioneers such as John Bowlby, who noted the suffering experienced by young children separated from their parents during evacuations in England during World War II, and further developed by scientists such as Mary Ainsworth, who refined the concept of early attachment between parent and child as fundamental to ongoing mental health as well as to cognitive and language development [10]. In the last decade there has been a deepening of our understanding of the impact of early trauma and other adverse childhood experiences (often referred to as ACES) on future physical as well as mental health [11]. ACES such as exposure to domestic violence, growing up in a household disrupted by substance abuse, and significant separations from primary caregivers have been shown to predict outcomes such as decreased academic success in childhood and cardiovascular and immune dysfunction in adulthood, while the existence of protective factors clearly mitigates possible negative consequences [12].

Another current trend is the development of evidence-based models of both prevention and therapeutic intervention for infants and very young children, including direct parent support and interventions to strengthen the parent-child relationship. Approaches such as Child-Parent Psychotherapy, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up, Circle of Security [13], Nurse-Family Partnership [14], and Triple P [15], when provided with fidelity by well-trained professionals, have been shown to significantly impact outcomes for children experiencing a wide range of challenges. The field of infant and young child mental health has also embraced the importance of collaboration with other professionals and service systems. Integrating mental health screening and interventions into pediatric care is one powerful tool in the effort to improve long-term outcomes for children. Improving training, compensation, and working conditions for those who provide early care and education is also receiving attention as a critical policy approach to improving social-emotional outcomes for young children alongside other family-centered social policies such as improved parental leave options.

Acknowledgements

Potential conflicts of interest. The authors are trainers for the NIDCAP. They have no other potential conflicts to report.

  • ©2020 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

    1. March of Dimes
    2018 Premature Birth Report Card: Report Card for North Carolina. March of Dimes website. https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/tools/reportcard.aspx?frmodrc=1&reg=37. Accessed August 29, 2019.
    1. Braddick O,
    2. Atkinson J,
    3. Innocenti GM
    1. Stiles J
    Brain Development and Nature versus Nurture Debate. In: Braddick O, Atkinson J, Innocenti GM, eds. Gene Expression to Neurobiology and Behavior: Human Brain Development and Developmental Disorders. Volume 189. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2011:1-352.
    1. Isaza M,
    2. Said M,
    3. Cabrera M,
    4. Rais-Bahrami K
    Parental Stress before and after Skin-to-skin Contact in the NICU. Presentation at: AAP National Conference and Exhibition; October 24-27, 2015; Washington, DC. https://aap.confex.com/aap/2015/webprogrampreliminary/Paper30863.html.
    1. Maitre NL,
    2. Key AP,
    3. Chroma OD, et al.
    The dual nature of early-life experience on somatosensory processing in the human brain. Curr Biol. 2017;27(7):1048-1054.
    1. Goldstein RF
    Developmental care for premature infants: a state of mind. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):e1322-1323.
    1. Lawhon G,
    2. Hedlund R
    Newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program training and education. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(2):133-144.
    1. Als H,
    2. Duffy FH,
    3. McAnulty GB, et al.
    Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):846-857.
    1. McAnulty G,
    2. Duffy FH,
    3. Kosta S, et al.
    School-age effects of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program for preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction: preliminary findings. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:25.
    1. Smith K,
    2. Buehler D,
    3. Als H
    NIDCAP Nursery Program: Nursery Assessment Manual. Boston, MA: NIDCAP Federation International; 2019. https://nidcap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Nursery-Assessment-Manual-w-Appendices-23Jan2019.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2019.
    1. Shonkoff JP,
    2. Phillips DA
    , eds. National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. https://www.nap.edu/read/9824/chapter/1. Published 2000. Accessed August 29, 2019.
    1. Felitti VJ
    Adverse childhood experiences and adult health. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9(3):131-132.
    1. Robles A,
    2. Gjelsvik A,
    3. Hirway P,
    4. Vivier PM,
    5. High P
    Adverse childhood experiences and protective factors with school engagement. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20182945.
    1. Bremner JG,
    2. Wachs TD
    1. Johnson MR,
    2. Appleyard K
    Infant psychosocial disorders. In: Bremner JG, Wachs TD, eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Infant Development. 2nd ed. Volume 2: Applied and Policy Issues. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.
    1. Olds DL,
    2. Kitzman HJ,
    3. Cole RE, et al.
    Enduring effects of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses on maternal life course and government spending: follow-up of a randomized trial among children at age 12 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(5):419-424.
    1. Sanders MR
    Triple p-positive parenting program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1999;2(2):71-90.

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2021 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire