Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
LetterCORRESPONDENCE

Letters of Correspondence: Telehealth, Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Lung Cancer Screening RatesTelehealth Has Been Great for Patients. Keep the Phone Visits.COVID-19’s Lasting Impact on North CaroliniansImproving Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Computerized Tomography Scan (LDCT) Enrollment Rates

Blake Fagan, John M. Baratta, Sangeeta Joshi, Louise King and Yuh-Chin T. Huang
North Carolina Medical Journal March 2022, 83 (2) 148-150; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.83.2.148
Blake Fagan
Chair, Department of Family Medicine, UNC Health Sciences, MAHEC, Asheville, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: blake.fagan@mahec.net
John M. Baratta
Assistant professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: baratta@med.unc.edu
Sangeeta Joshi
Critical care specialist and pulmonologist, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sangeeta.joshi@duke.edu
Louise King
Assistant professor, Department of Internal Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuh-Chin T. Huang
Pulmonologist, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Telehealth Has Been Great for Patients. Keep the Phone Visits.

To the Editor—NC Medicaid responded quickly to the COVID-19 pandemic by permitting reimbursement for telehealth visits by video and phone. Patients who had NC Medicaid, including pregnant women and immunocompromised patients, were able to continue to receive medical care from their providers while staying safe where they reside.

On behalf of patients and the medical community, I would like to say, “Thank you!”

As North Carolina inches toward herd immunity and this latest wave of COVID-19 infections (hopefully) continues to abate, there appears to be consensus around keeping reimbursement parity for telehealth at par with in-person office visits. But there is discussion around dropping phone visits, because of concerns that providers are doing “quick, low-quality” phone visits and NC Medicaid and other payers are experiencing an explosion in costs.

On the other hand, many patients have benefited from phone visits. In rural areas, particularly in the mountains, internet access does not exist or is so poor that streaming video does not work. Many patients, especially the elderly, do not have smart phones or cannot figure out how to connect to a video session despite much assistance.

I and many colleagues truly believe we are providing quality care via phone visits. Patients express gratefulness that they do not have to come to the clinic because of concerns about exposure to illness, lack of transportation, lack of money for gas, etc. Furthermore, I believe employers, especially with staffing issues, are more than happy to have an employee step away from work to spend 10 to 20 minutes on the phone with a provider versus taking a half-day off to drive to a clinic.

The reality is that providers have to pay their expenses. So, if phone visits are eliminated and patients cannot do a video telehealth visit, then providers will ask patients to come in for an in-person visit because of the reimbursement model.

I truly hope that NC Medicaid, Medicare, and commercial insurance providers will keep phone visits as an option.

Acknowledgments

Disclosure of interests. No interests were disclosed.

  • ©2022 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

COVID-19’s Lasting Impact on North Carolinians

To the Editor—The long-term consequences of COVID-19 infection are increasingly recognized as a significant public health concern. Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), commonly known as Long COVID, is a collection of persistent symptoms that continue after resolution of the initial COVID-19 infection. It is estimated that this post-viral syndrome may impact 10%–30% of COVID-19 survivors [1, 2]. Given the large caseloads within North Carolina, there may be more than 150,000–400,000 survivors of COVID-19 affected by PASC in our state. The potential impact on North Carolinians, and our health care system, is substantial.

The presentation of PASC can be variable across physical, cognitive, and psychologic domains. The most common effects include fatigue, respiratory difficulties, headaches, anxiety, depression, and memory impairments (“brain fog”) [3]. Those who experience mild effects may be able to continue daily activities with little interruption, but many of the moderately or severely affected survivors will be limited in their ability to attend to home, school, and work duties. These implications were recently underscored by President Biden when he announced that those with PASC may qualify for benefits under the Americans with Disabilities Act [4, 5].

Our academic health care center has responded by developing a multidisciplinary PASC clinic. The clinic structure includes panel evaluations by physicians specialized in rehabilitation medicine, internal medicine, and psychiatry; a neuropsychologist; physical and occupational therapists; and a social worker. We have found this collaborative and coordinated approach necessary due to the complex nature of patients’ medical presentations and psychosocial impacts.

While we have been able to help hundreds of North Carolinians struggling with PASC, there are thousands more who require focused post-COVID-19 care. We urge government and health organization leaders to consider how they can assist with the funding and delivery of equitable post-COVID-19 care to those within our state. An integrated approach providing comprehensive evaluation and treatment is needed to mitigate the effects of PASC. Health care workers of all levels need to be educated on post-COVID-19 conditions and equipped to treat them appropriately. Patients in North Carolina with PASC deserve knowledgeable and compassionate care.

Acknowledgments

Funding for the UNC COVID Recovery Clinic was provided from UNC Hospitals, UNC Faculty Physicians, and the UNC Health Foundation.

Disclosure of interests. No interests were disclosed.

  • ©2022 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Logue JK,
    2. Franko NM,
    3. McCulloch DJ, et al.
    Sequelae in adults at 6 months after COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e210830. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0830
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Al-Aly Z,
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Bowe B.
    High-dimensional characterization of post-acute sequalae of COVID-19. Nature. 2021;594(7862):259–264. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03553-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. The Lancet
    . Understanding long COVID: a modern medical challenge. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):725. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01900-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Biden-Harris Administration Marks Anniversary of Americans with Disabilities Act and Announces Resources to Support Individuals with Long COVID [news release]. Published July 26, 2021. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/07/26/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-marks-anniversary-of-americans-with-disabilities-act-and-announces-resources-to-support-individuals-with-long-covid/
  5. 5.↵
    Guidance on “Long COVID” as a Disability Under the ADA, Section 504, and Section 1557. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights. Published July 26, 2021. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-providers/civil-rights-covid19/guidance-long-covid-disability/index.html

Improving Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Computerized Tomography Scan (LDCT) Enrollment Rates

To the Editor—Dr. Tailor and colleagues report in the November/December issue about low lung cancer screening enrollment rates of 1.5%–12.5% in lung cancer screening-eligible population estimates from Durham County, North Carolina, utilizing publicly available census tract and smoking prevalence data [1]. The 2015 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend annual lung cancer screening with LDCT in adults aged 55–80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years [2]. The “State of Lung Cancer 2020” report from the American Lung Association shows similarly low rates across the United States [3]. Improving screening rates in the eligible population could potentially reduce the lung cancer death rate by 20%, highlighting the importance of lung cancer screening [2].

Proactive eligibility screening with a shared decision-making discussion is a potential area of opportunity to increase enrollment of eligible candidates. The shared decision-making discussion should focus on the potential risks and benefits of screening and ensure eligibility for curative surgery by exclusion of populations with substantial comorbid conditions, life-limiting conditions, poor functional status, or reluctance to undergo surgery [2]. Barriers such as complexity of eligibility assessment, recall bias, time constraints, and lack of resources for sharing decision-making could further contribute to low lung cancer screening rates [4–6]. Thus, moving the shared decision-making screening discussion to specialty clinics, like pulmonology, could help address some of these barriers. Telehealth access to specialty offices could also be a potential strategy for addressing the time constraint, provided that the time is adequately reimbursed by the payers. These barriers also highlight the need for multidisciplinary teams that include pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and case managers to aid with the shared decision-making process and follow-up. This could increase the enrollment of eligible patients while protecting them from unintended harm. Future studies should assess feasibility and impact of strategies addressing the barriers to LDCT screening enrollments toward improving lung cancer outcomes in high-risk populations.

Acknowledgments

Disclosure of interests. No interests were disclosed.

  • ©2022 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tailor TD,
    2. Farrow NE,
    3. Gao J,
    4. Choudhury KR,
    5. Tong BC.
    Lung cancer screening eligibility and use: a population health perspective of one community. N C Med J. 2021;82(5):321–326. doi: 10.18043/ncm.82.5.321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
    . Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330–338. doi: 10.7326/M13-2771
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. American Lung Association
    . State of Lung Cancer: 2020 Report. Published 2021. Accessed January 19, 2022. https://www.lung.org/getmedia/381ca407-a4e9-4069-b24b-195811f29a00/solc-2020-report-final.pdf
  4. 4.↵
    1. Duong DK,
    2. Shariff-Marco S,
    3. Cheng I, et al.
    Patient and primary care provider attitudes and adherence towards lung cancer screening at an academic medical center. Prev Med Rep. 2017;6:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.01.012
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Sussman AL,
    3. Getrich CM, et al.
    Attitudes and beliefs of primary care providers in New Mexico about lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lopez-Olivo MA,
    2. Minnix JA,
    3. Fox JG, et al.
    Smoking cessation and shared decision-making practices about lung cancer screening among primary care providers. Cancer Med. 2021;10(4):1357–1365. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3714
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  • ©2022 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

North Carolina Medical Journal: 83 (2)
North Carolina Medical Journal
Vol. 83, Issue 2
March/April 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on North Carolina Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letters of Correspondence: Telehealth, Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Lung Cancer Screening RatesTelehealth Has Been Great for Patients. Keep the Phone Visits.COVID-19’s Lasting Impact on North CaroliniansImproving Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Comput…
(Your Name) has sent you a message from North Carolina Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the North Carolina Medical Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Letters of Correspondence: Telehealth, Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Lung Cancer Screening RatesTelehealth Has Been Great for Patients. Keep the Phone Visits.COVID-19’s Lasting Impact on North CaroliniansImproving Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Computerized Tomography Scan (LDCT) Enrollment Rates
Blake Fagan, John M. Baratta, Sangeeta Joshi, Louise King, Yuh-Chin T. Huang
North Carolina Medical Journal Mar 2022, 83 (2) 148-150; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.83.2.148

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Letters of Correspondence: Telehealth, Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Lung Cancer Screening RatesTelehealth Has Been Great for Patients. Keep the Phone Visits.COVID-19’s Lasting Impact on North CaroliniansImproving Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Computerized Tomography Scan (LDCT) Enrollment Rates
Blake Fagan, John M. Baratta, Sangeeta Joshi, Louise King, Yuh-Chin T. Huang
North Carolina Medical Journal Mar 2022, 83 (2) 148-150; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.83.2.148
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Perinatal Substance Use Care Coordination: The Need for One Care Plan
  • Raising Awareness of Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia in Native Americans in North Carolina
Show more CORRESPONDENCE

Similar Articles

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2022 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire