Variations in Receipt of Contraceptives by Insurance Status and Race/Ethnicity

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Finer LB,
   2. Zolna MR.

   Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–852. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Sedgh G,
   2. Singh S,
   3. Hussain R.

   Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45(3):301–314. PMID: 25207494

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Sonfield A,
   2. Kost K.

   Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies and the Role of Public Insurance Programs in Paying for Pregnancy-Related Care: National and State Estimates for 2010. Guttmacher Institute; 2015. Accessed June 29, 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/public-costs-of-up-2010.pdf
4. 4.↵
   1. Maxson P,
   2. Miranda ML.

   Pregnancy intention, demographic differences, and psychosocial health. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(8):1215–1223. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2379

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.
   1. Dagher RK,
   2. Hofferth SL,
   3. Lee Y.

   Maternal depression, pregnancy intention, and return to paid work after childbirth. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(3):e297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.002

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 6.↵
   1. Kim TY,
   2. Dagher RK,
   3. Chen J.

   Racial/ethnic differences in unintended pregnancy: Evidence from a national sample of U.S. women. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(4):427–435. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.027

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Pettiford B.

   Creating a better state of health for women. N C Med J. 2016;77(6):385–387. doi: 10.18043/ncm.77.6.385

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Finer LB,
   2. Kost K.

   Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43(2):78–87. doi: 10.1363/4307811.PMID:21651706

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Rocca CH,
   2. Harper CC.

   Do racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive attitudes and knowledge explain disparities in method use? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;44(3):150–158. doi: 10.1363/4415012

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Wilson EK.

    Differences in contraceptive use across generations of migration among women of Mexican origin. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(5):641–651. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0382-9

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Cyrus E,
    2. Gollub EL,
    3. Jean-Gilles M,
    4. Neptune S,
    5. Pelletier V,
    6. Devieux J.

    An exploratory study of acculturation and reproductive health among Haitian and Haitian-American women in Little Haiti, South Florida. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(3):666–672. doi: 10.1007/s10903-015-0235-8

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Thaxton L,
    2. Espey E.

    Family planning American style redux: Unintended pregnancy improves, barriers remain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(1):41–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.11.001

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Kost K.

    Unintended Pregnancy Rates at the State Level: Estimates for 2010 and Trends Since 2002. Guttmacher Institute; 2015. Accessed July 12, 2021. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/StateUP10.pdf.
14. 14.↵
    1. Kost K,
    2. Maddow-Zimet I,
    3. Arpaia A.

    Pregnancies, Births and Abortions Among Adolescents and Young Women In the United States, 2013: National and State Trends by Age, Race and Ethnicity. Guttmacher Institute; 2017. Accessed July 12, 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/us-adolescent-pregnancy-trends-2013.pdf
15. 15.↵
    1. Usinger KM,
    2. Gola SB,
    3. Weis M,
    4. Smaldone A.

    Intrauterine contraception continuation in adolescents and young women: A systematic review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(6):659–667. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.007

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Pritt NM,
    2. Norris AH,
    3. Berlan ED.

    Barriers and facilitators to adolescents’ use of long-acting reversible contraceptives. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(1):18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.07.002

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Broecker J,
    2. Jurich J,
    3. Fuchs R.

    The relationship between long-acting reversible contraception and insurance coverage: a retrospective analysis. Contraception. 2016;93(3):266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.006

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Eisenberg D,
    2. McNicholas C,
    3. Peipert JF.

    Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4 Suppl):S59–S63. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.012

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kumar N,
    2. Brown JD.

    Access barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(3):248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.039

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Planned Parenthood

    . Birth Control. Accessed June 30, 2020. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control
21. 21.↵
    1. Mecklenburg County

    . 2019 Mecklenburg County Community Health Assessment. Accessed November 19, 2020. https://www.mecknc.gov/HealthDepartment/HealthStatistics/Documents/Mecklenburg%20CHA%202019.pdf
22. 22.↵
    1. US Census Bureau

    . Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Accessed November 19, 2020. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/profile?g=0500000US37119
23. 23.↵
    1. Kramer RD,
    2. Higgins JA,
    3. Godecker AL,
    4. Ehrenthal DB.

    Racial and ethnic differences in patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the United States, 2011–2015. Contraception. 2018;97(5):399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.006

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 24.↵
    1. Dehlendorf C,
    2. Park SY,
    3. Emeremni CA,
    4. Comer D,
    5. Vincett K,
    6. Borrero S.

    Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women’s reproductive experiences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(6):526e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.037

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. North Carolina Division of Medical Assistance

    . Reimbursement of Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARCs). NCMA; 2018. Accessed July 12, 2021. https://files.nc.gov/ncdma/documents/files/Special_Bulletin_LARC_2016_08.pdf
26. 26.↵
    1. Carmon I.

    For eugenic sterilization victims, belated justice. MSNBC. June 24, 2014. Accessed June 29, 2022. http://www.msnbc.com/all/eugenic-sterilization-victims-belated-justice#:~:text=How%20forced%20sterilization%20took%20hold,people%20from%201929%20to%201974
27. 27.↵
    1. Rose J.

    A Brutal Chapter In North Carolina’s Eugenics Past. NPR. December 28, 2011. Accessed June 29, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2011/12/28/144375339/a-brutal-chapter-in-north-carolinas-eugenics-past
28. 28.↵
    1. Tapp H,
    2. Smith HA,
    3. Dixon JT,
    4. Ludden T,
    5. Dulin M.

    Evaluating primary care delivery systems for an uninsured Hispanic immigrant population. Fam Community Health. 2013;36(1):19–33. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e31826d7562

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Ludden TM,
    2. Taylor YJ,
    3. Simmons LK, et al.

    Using community-based participatory research to develop geospatial models toward improving community health for disadvantaged Hispanic populations in Charlotte, NC. J Prim Prev. 2018;39(2):171–190. doi: 10.1007/s10935-018-0505-z

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 30.↵
    1. Coffman MJ,
    2. de Hernandez BU,
    3. Smith HA, et al.

    Using CBPR to decrease health disparities in a nuburban Latino Neighborhood. Hisp Health Care Int. 2017;15(3):121–129. doi: 10.1177/1540415317727569

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Johnston EM,
    2. McMorrow S.

    The relationship between insurance coverage and use of prescription contraception by race and ethnicity: Lessons from the Affordable Care Act. Womens Health Issues. 2020;30(2):73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.11.005

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 32.↵
    1. Craig AD,
    2. Dehlendorf C,
    3. Borrero S,
    4. Harper CC,
    5. Rocca CH.

    Exploring young adults’ contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: disparities by race/ethnicity and age. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(3):e281–9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.003

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. 33.↵
    1. Kavanaugh ML,
    2. Jerman J,
    3. Finer LB.

    Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. women, 2009–2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):917–927. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Lara M,
    2. Gamboa C,
    3. Kahramanian MI,
    4. Morales LS,
    5. Bautista DE.

    Acculturation and Latino health in the United States: A review of the literature and its sociopolitical context. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:367–397. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144615

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Borrero S,
    2. Schwarz EB,
    3. Creinin M,
    4. Ibrahim S.

    The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(1):91–96. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0976

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Higgins JA,
    2. Kramer RD,
    3. Ryder KM.

    Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: Perceptions of young adult women. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(11):1932–1937. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Harper CC,
    2. Blum M,
    3. de Bocanegra HT, et al.

    Challenges in translating evidence to practice: The provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1359–1369. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Stanwood NL,
    2. Garrett JM,
    3. Konrad TR.

    Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):275–280. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01726-4

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Luchowski AT,
    2. Anderson BL,
    3. Power ML,
    4. Raglan GB,
    5. Espey E,
    6. Schulkin J.

    Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education. Contraception. 2014;89(6):578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.02.004

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. 40.↵
    1. Kathawa CA,
    2. Arora KS.

    Implicit bias in counseling for permanent contraception: Historical context and recommendations for counseling. Health Equity. 2020;4(1):326–329. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0025

    OpenUrlCrossRef