Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
Research ArticlePolicy Forum

Running the Numbers

Health Insurance Coverage in North Carolina: The Rural-Urban Uninsured Gap

Randy Randolph and Mark Holmes
North Carolina Medical Journal November 2018, 79 (6) 397-401; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.79.6.397
Randy Randolph
applications specialist, North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: randy_randolph@unc.edu
Mark Holmes
director, North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

One of the primary drivers of health is being covered by health insurance. A review of available literature found a wide range of effects of health insurance, including a 20% relative reduction in mortality among previously uninsured people who become eligible for Medicare [1]. Many factors lead to lower rates of health insurance coverage in rural areas compared to urban areas: for example, rural residents typically have lower incomes [2], more employment in small businesses [3] that are often economically unable to provide health insurance for their employees [4, 5], and lower enrollment in the Health Insurance Marketplace (“Obamacare” plans) [6]. In this piece, we present data on the disparity in health insurance coverage between urban (metropolitan) and rural (nonmetropolitan) counties in North Carolina.

Methods and Data Sources

The two primary data sources for health insurance coverage trace to continuous surveying from the US Census Bureau. The American Community Survey (ACS) surveys about 2.3 million residents nationally per year, asking for demographic, economic, and housing information. This annual effort has replaced the detailed, long-form survey that was part of the decennial census until 2000; instead of a large share of American households completing the long form every 10 years, a smaller share is surveyed every year. The ACS data summaries are reported in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year compilations, but areas with fewer than 10,000 people (eg, many North Carolina rural counties) are reported only in 5-year groupings to protect respondents from potentially being identified by the combination of precise social measures reported in the ACS. Health insurance information in the file reports whether the respondent had health insurance that year for many population subgroups and type of insurance (or none) for fewer subgroups. These data describe the area characteristics for a 5-year period, most recently the years 2012 through 2016. A second source—the Census Bureau's Small Area Health Insurance Estimates (SAHIE) program—uses data from the ACS program, but enhances the annual data with models that yield single-year county estimates for small places where the Census Bureau is restricted from publishing the unenhanced data for the same period. This approach is similar to one that our team has used for years prior to the development of the SAHIE [7]. The SAHIE data only addresses presence or absence of health insurance for an individual and limits its scope to Americans under 65 years old.

Although there are many systems for classifying rural or urban status for regions in the United States, our use of counties in this context leads us to measure based on the most popular federal definition. Using the Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA) system by the US Office of Management and Budget (and published in data tables by the Census Bureau), metropolitan counties are usually classified as urban areas and other counties as rural. The CBSA system identifies major and minor employment commuting areas as metropolitan and micropolitan areas (counties in the employment market serving a metropolitan core area or that of a micropolitan core) with many noncore counties that receive neither designation. Some counties with a high commuting pattern into metropolitan areas may appear “rural” to most people, but this is a common issue with county based rural classification schemes.

Findings

The rural counties in North Carolina have a larger share of residents with no health insurance than the urban counties. Figure 1 contains maps of the countywide SAHIE estimates of insurance coverage for residents under 65 years of age [8, 9]. The maps show the same categories (based on quintiles for all 100 counties, with some variation in category counts due to single-digit precision of the data) for rural counties in the top map and for urban counties below. While rural areas contain 54% of the counties in North Carolina, these areas account for 20 of the 22 counties with the highest percentage of residents without health insurance, and only five of the 21 North Carolina counties with the highest percentage of residents having insurance. Clusters of rural counties with health insurance shortages are conspicuous in the mountain and southern coastal plain regions.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Percentage of Population without Health Insurance in Rural and Urban North Carolina: Residents Less Than 65 Years Old, 2016

Though rural counties in North Carolina generally have more residents without health insurance, not all segments of the rural population are less likely to be insured than their urban counterparts. The data in Table 1 is compiled from the ACS for the period 2012–2016 [9, 10]. The share of the population without health insurance is shown for all of North Carolina, rural counties, and urban counties for ACS population characteristics including age, gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, income (indexed to poverty threshold), educational attainment, employment status, and citizenship. The majority of the summaries for these measures show rural North Carolina residents less likely to have health insurance than those in urban areas. It is notable that, among many citizen groups traditionally vulnerable to losing health insurance coverage, a larger share of rural residents had health insurance during this time period. In rural North Carolina these groups—preschool children, those over 65 years of age, those with no college coursework, and those below 200% of the federal poverty threshold—all have a smaller percentage of population without health insurance than in the urban areas. Health insurance coverage for noncitizens is relatively rare in North Carolina, but in rural areas, shortage of insurance coverage for the group is severe. The very high rate of health insurance coverage in the age 65 and over categories demonstrates the ubiquity of Medicare in that population.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1.

Percentage of North Carolina Residents with No Health Insurance by Rural-Urban Status and Demographic Categories, 2012-2016

During the period that the ACS has measured health insurance coverage, the share of North Carolina residents with health insurance coverage has increased in rural and urban areas. The insurance coverage categories in the ACS were summarized as residents with private insurance, with (any) public insurance, and with no insurance for the earliest and most recent periods in Figure 2. Metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore areas all had more insured residents in the most recent (years 2012–2016) ACS 5-year time period when compared with the first period for which the data was reported (years 2009–2013) [8, 10, 11]. Rural and urban areas had comparable reductions in the percentage of residents without insurance. All rural/urban categories experienced small increases in the share of population with health insurance. The percentage of residents with private insurance increased, as did the share with all or some public coverage. The correspondence between increased public insurance coverage rates and the reduced share of residents without insurance implies that federal policy aiming to increase health coverage has improved the percent covered by roughly three points in all North Carolina urbanization categories.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Source of Health Insurance Coverage by Rural-Urban Categories, 2009-2013 and 2012-2016

Acknowledgments

Potential conflicts of interest. R.R and M.H. have no relevant conflicts of interest.

  • ©2018 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. McWilliams JM
    Health consequences of uninsurance among adults in the United States: recent evidence and implications. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):443-494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Rural Health Snapshot (2017). Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2017. http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/download/14853/. Accessed August 29, 2018.
  3. ↵
    1. Ziller EC,
    2. Coburn AF,
    3. Yousefian AE
    Out-of-pocket health spending and the rural underinsured. Health Aff. 2006;25(6):1688-1699.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Eibner C
    The Economic Burden of Providing Health Insurance: How much worse off are small firms? Santa Monica CA: The RAND Corporation; 2008.
  5. ↵
    1. Fronstin P
    Small employers and health benefits: Findings from the 2000 Small Employer Health Benefits Survey. Washington, DC: Employee Benefit Research Institute; 2000. https://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/1000ib.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2018.
  6. ↵
    1. Drake C,
    2. Abraham JM,
    3. McCullough JS
    Rural enrollment in the federally facilitated marketplace. J Rural Health. 2016;32(3):332-339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ricketts TC,
    2. Holmes GM
    Running the numbers: The uninsured in North Carolina. N C Med J. 2005;66(6):235-236.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. United States Census Bureau
    Core based statistical areas (CBSAs), metropolitan divisions, and combined statistical areas (CSAs), August 2017. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau; 2017; https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/metro-micro/geographies/reference-files/2017/delineation-files/list1.xls. Accessed April 11, 2018.
  9. ↵
    1. United States Census Bureau
    2016 Small Area Health Insurance Estimates (SAHIE). Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau; 2018; https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/sahie/datasets/time-series/estimates-acs/sahie-2016-txt.zip. Accessed May 18, 2018.
  10. ↵
    1. United States Census Bureau
    Summary File: 2012 – 2016 American Community Survey. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau's American Community Survey Office; 2017; http://ftp2.census.gov/. Accessed December 13, 2017.
  11. ↵
    1. United States Census Bureau
    Summary File: 2009 – 2013 American Community Survey. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau's American Community Survey Office; 2014; http://ftp2.census.gov/. Accessed May 15, 2015.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

North Carolina Medical Journal: 79 (6)
North Carolina Medical Journal
Vol. 79, Issue 6
November-December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on North Carolina Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Running the Numbers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from North Carolina Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the North Carolina Medical Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Running the Numbers
Randy Randolph, Mark Holmes
North Carolina Medical Journal Nov 2018, 79 (6) 397-401; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.79.6.397

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Running the Numbers
Randy Randolph, Mark Holmes
North Carolina Medical Journal Nov 2018, 79 (6) 397-401; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.79.6.397
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods and Data Sources
    • Findings
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Looking Back But Leaning Forward: New Opportunities and Challenges for North Carolina's Rural Communities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Policy Forum

  • Breaking the Cycle
  • Breaking the Cycle
  • From Here to There—With a Spring in Our Steps
Show more Policy Forum

DEPARTMENT

  • Spotlight on the Safety Net
  • Spotlight on the Safety Net
  • Running the Numbers
Show more DEPARTMENT

Similar Articles

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2022 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire