Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
Research ArticlePolicy Forum

Running the Numbers

Understanding the Prevalence of Eye and Ear Injuries in North Carolina

Shana M. Geary, Mary E. Cox and Scott K. Proescholdbell
North Carolina Medical Journal March 2017, 78 (2) 134-137; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.78.2.134
Shana M. Geary
CSTE/CDC applied epidemiology fellow, Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, Chronic Disease and Injury Section, NC Division of Public Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E. Cox
epidemiologist, Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, North Carolina Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott K. Proescholdbell
epidemiologist Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, North Carolina Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: scott.proescholdbell@dhhs.nc.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Background

Eye and ear injuries range in severity from minor bruises, scrapes, or scratches to severe trauma that may cause long-term hearing or vision loss [1, 2]. The extent of the injury is a direct result of the force or object that causes it [2]. Corneal abrasion, caused by scratches from small objects, is the most common injury impacting the eye [1]. Injuries to the ear can vary from trauma induced injuries resulting from a fall or blow to the head to injuries acquired through exposure to noise that often lead to chronic hearing loss [2]. A large proportion of injuries sustained to the eye or ear are preventable, particularly through the use of protective wear such as eyewear or earplugs [1, 2].

Methods

This analysis used data from North Carolina emergency department (ED) visits in 2014, obtained from the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT). Ear and eye injuries were identified within the 2014 ED data using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. The sample was limited to 2014 data due to the transition of the ICD codes from the 9th to the 10th revision in October of 2015. ICD-10-CM offers additional, more specific codes that could increase the number of injuries captured within the last quarter of 2015, potentially impacting the total number of ear and eye injuries captured for that year.

The ICD-9-CM codes used to identify eye injuries followed the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch (AFHSB) Surveillance Case Definitions report on eye injuries [1]. In addition, the external cause code (E-code) for a foreign body accidentally entering the eye and adnexa (E914) was included to identify any additional eye injuries, particularly in cases where diagnosis codes were not present. The ICD-9-CM codes used to identify ear injuries also followed the AFHSB guidelines from the Surveillance Case Definitions Report on noise-induced hearing injuries [2]. Because these codes were limited to noise-induced injuries, ICD-9-CM codes obtained from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association report on ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes related to speech and hearing disorders were also included in the case definition [3]. Cases were included if the ear or eye injury codes were present in any diagnosis field, and were limited to North Carolina residents. Rates of ear and eye injury per 100,000 North Carolina residents were calculated by age and sex. Percentages were calculated for the top diagnoses for both eye and ear injuries. A severity index was unavailable to determine the severity of the injuries. The discharge date of patients was also unavailable, preventing the calculation of length of stay. The final patient disposition and transport mode were used as proxies to understand injury severity.

Results

Ear Injuries

In 2014, ED visits for ear injuries totaled 8,164. North Carolina residents accounted for 7,795 (95.5%) of these injuries. Slightly more ear injuries occurred among males than females, 53.4% and 46.6%, respectively. The rate of ear injury per 100,000 was 1.2 times greater among males than females. Ear injuries were more prevalent among the oldest and youngest of the population, with the highest rates occurring among those aged 85 and older and those 9 and younger for both males and females (see Figure 1). The majority of ear injuries seen in the ED had a first-listed diagnosis code for foreign body in ear (34.3%). Open wound of the ear was the second most common (14.0%), followed by tinnitus (5.6%) and otalgia (3.1%). Open wound of the ear included wounds to the ear drum, external ear, and unspecified parts of the ear. The top 5 first listed diagnoses are shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Rates of Ear Injuries Seen in Emergency Departments, North Carolina Residents, 2014

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Top Five First Listed Diagnoses for Ear Injuries Among North Carolina Residents Seen in Emergency Departments, 2014

Information on how the patient arrived to the ED was available for 88.4% of ear injuries (n = 6,893), with most injuries arriving as walk-ins (79.7%); 13.5% of injuries were transported by ambulance, while only 22 cases (0.3%) that included an ear injury diagnosis were severe enough to require air transport. Final disposition was available for 97.5% of ear injuries (n = 7,604). Most individuals were discharged home (91.1%). Less than 5% of ear injuries seen in the ED required hospitalization, with only 8 cases (1.1%) severe enough to be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Only two cases where ear injury was listed among the diagnoses resulted in death. Payment source information was available for 93.9% of ear injuries seen in the ED. Medicaid was the most frequently used payment source (30.1%), followed by an insurance company (21.3%) and self-pay (19.6%).

Eye injuries

In 2014, ED visits for eye injuries totaled 22,167, of which 20,999 (94.9%) were North Carolina residents. More eye injuries occurred among men (61.6%) than women (38.4%). The rate of eye injury was 1.7 times greater for male residents than for female residents, 266.8 per 100,000 and 158.2 per 100,000, respectively. The rate of injury was greatest for males between the ages of 25 and 34 (412.6 per 100,000), whereas the rate of eye injury for women peaked among those aged 85 and older (324.1 per 100,000) (see Figure 3). Most eye injuries seen in the ED were for a superficial injury of the cornea (18.7%), followed by eye contusions (8.5%), foreign body on external eye (7.8%), and pain in or around the eye (5.4%). Eye contusions included unspecified contusions of the eye, contusions of orbital tissue, and contusions of eyelids and periocular area. The top 5 first listed diagnoses can be found in Figure 4. E-codes were listed in 83.2% of eye injury cases, of which E914 was the most common E-code present (16.0%). 3,188 cases were missing an eye injury diagnosis code. Of these, 87.9% had E914 listed as the first listed E-code.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Rates of Eye Injuries Seen in Emergency Departments, North Carolina Residents, 2014

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Top 10 First Listed Diagnoses for Eye Injuries Among North Carolina Residents Seen in Emergency Departments, 2014

Transport mode was available for 87.8% of eye injuries (n = 18,430). Most eye injuries were walk-ins (76.5%), followed by those arriving by ambulance (16.2%). 93 cases (0.5%) where eye injury was listed among the diagnoses were severe enough to require air transport to the ED. The final disposition was available for 97.9% of eye injuries (n = 20,559), of which most were discharged home (90.0%). 5.6% of eye injuries were later hospitalized with 0.2% requiring intensive care. Less than 0.2% of cases where eye injury was listed among the diagnoses resulted in death. Information on the payment source for the ED visit was available for 93% of eye injury cases. The majority of visits were covered by self-pay (24.9%), an insurance company (22.7%), or Medicaid (21.2%).

Conclusion

Ear and eye injuries are a large contributor to ED admissions among North Carolina residents. Rates reveal differing trends by age and sex for both types of injuries. Eye and ear injuries are more common among males than females but differ in their distribution across age groups, with ear injuries impacting the very young and the elderly, and eye injuries impacting young adults and the elderly. The vast majority of ear and eye injuries admitted to the ED appear to be minor, based on the large percentage of cases that transported themselves to the ED and that did not require further hospitalization or treatment. However, the true severity of these injuries remains unknown, as do the long-term impacts such as medical and work loss costs. Most ear and eye injuries are preventable; however, more information is needed on the circumstances of these injuries to guide prevention efforts.

Acknowledgments

For Geary, this study/report was supported in part by an appointment to the Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program administered by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cooperative Agreement Number 1U38OT000143-03.

Proescholdbell and the Injury and Violence Prevention Branch, Division of Public Health, NC DHHS also receive support from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

  • ©2017 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch
    Surveillance Case Definitions. Military Health System and Defense Health Agency website. http://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Publications/2016/10/01/Hearing-Injuries-NoiseInduced. Accessed December 9, 2016.
  2. ↵
    Eye Injuries. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch: Surveillance Case Definitions Website. http://www.health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Health-Readiness/Armed-Forces-Health-Surveillance-Branch/Epidemiology-and-Analysis/Surveillance-Case-Definitions. Published January 2016. Accessed December 9, 2016.
  3. ↵
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    2015 ICD=9-CM Diagnosis Codes Related to Speech and Hearing Disorders. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2014. http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/ICD-9-Diagnosis-Codes.pdf. Published October 1, 2014. Accessed December 9, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

North Carolina Medical Journal: 78 (2)
North Carolina Medical Journal
Vol. 78, Issue 2
March-April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on North Carolina Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Running the Numbers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from North Carolina Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the North Carolina Medical Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Running the Numbers
Shana M. Geary, Mary E. Cox, Scott K. Proescholdbell
North Carolina Medical Journal Mar 2017, 78 (2) 134-137; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.78.2.134

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Running the Numbers
Shana M. Geary, Mary E. Cox, Scott K. Proescholdbell
North Carolina Medical Journal Mar 2017, 78 (2) 134-137; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.78.2.134
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Introduction to The NCMJ's Special Issue on Vision and Hearing Loss
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Policy Forum

  • Breaking the Cycle
  • Breaking the Cycle
  • From Here to There—With a Spring in Our Steps
Show more Policy Forum

DEPARTMENTS

  • COVID-19 Reflections: COVID-19 Vaccination in North Carolina: Promoting Equity by Partnering with Communities and Health Care Providers
  • COVID-19 Reflections: We Are Not OK: Safety Net Primary Care Access in a Non-Expansion State Amid COVID-19
  • Focus on Philanthropy: How The John Rex Endowment Helped Fund Healthier Places in Wake County
Show more DEPARTMENTS

Similar Articles

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2022 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire