Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
Research ArticlePolicy Forum

CenteringPregnancy

Meeting the Quadruple Aim in Prenatal Care

Carmen Strickland, Shannon Merrell and Julienne K. Kirk
North Carolina Medical Journal November 2016, 77 (6) 394-397; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.6.394
Carmen Strickland
associate professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston–Salem, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cgstrick@wakehealth.edu
Shannon Merrell
practice services manager, Centering Healthcare Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julienne K. Kirk
professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston–Salem, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

CenteringPregnancy is a group prenatal care model that engages pregnant women in their care, which results in promising health and system outcomes. This commentary will review this innovative care model with a focus on patient experience, population health outcomes, cost effectiveness, and provider experience.

Exciting changes are occurring in health care as the United States transitions to a value-based system. In 2014, Bodenheimer challenged us to seek not only the Triple Aim (enhancing the experience of care, improving population health, and reducing health care costs) but also to attend to the well-being of health care providers—the fourth part of what is now known as the Quadruple Aim [1, 2]. Group medical visits are an innovation in health care that shows promise in meeting these goals. CenteringPregnancy, a finalist for the 2016 Hearst Health Prize [3], is a group prenatal care model supported by the Centering Healthcare Institute that is offered in 450 practices across the United States. This groundbreaking model for providing patient-centered maternity care in groups is meeting the Quadruple Aim in North Carolina.

A Model of Group Prenatal Care

In CenteringPregnancy, pregnant women participate in prenatal appointments with 8–12 other women sharing similar due dates. Ten appointments, each lasting 90–120 minutes, follow the recommended schedule of prenatal care [4]. CenteringPregnancy reconfigures the typical components found in traditional prenatal care. In this model, patients meet with provider teams in a facilitated session that incorporates health assessment, interactive learning, and patient activation. Each group maintains continuity throughout the patients' pregnancy care, which fosters community building and provides a supportive network.

Developed in the early 1990s by certified nurse midwife Sharon Rising, CenteringPregnancy is now supported by the Centering Healthcare Institute. The mission of the Centering Healthcare Institute is to transform health care using patient-centered group care models [5]. In addition to improving patient outcomes, the CenteringPregnancy model also boosts provider satisfaction. CenteringPregnancy is thus delivering the Quadruple Aim of improved patient experience, quality of care, cost containment, and provider satisfaction (see Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1.

Experiences in CenteringPregnancy

Comparing CenteringPregnancy With Traditional Care

While all clinical aspects of traditional prenatal care are maintained in the CenteringPregnancy model, there are important changes related to the total time invested in the patient's care and the way in which women interact with their providers. Compared to a pregnant patient's traditional 10–15-minute prenatal visit, women in a CenteringPregnancy session engage in 2 hours of care. Each group session begins with patients' taking their own vital signs and then having time to socialize while the provider meets with patients one-on-one for a brief prenatal health assessment. For the rest of the visit, patients discuss topics related to their pregnancy as an interactive group (see Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

CenteringPregnancy Interactive Group

CenteringPregnancy providers receive special training to develop effective facilitation skills [6]. Two cofacilitators, typically a provider and a support staff member, lead guided discussions and direct activities to optimize group functioning. The Centering Healthcare Institute encourages and supports practices in tracking outcomes related to patient education, patient satisfaction, and the quality of facilitation, in addition to tracking pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Quadruple Aim Outcomes

Patient Experience

The CenteringPregnancy model improves the patient care experience in several ways [7-9]. First, the added time during visits allows for a dynamic dialogue between the women in the group and their providers; such dialogue would be difficult to achieve during a fast-paced individual visit. In this extra time, patients have the opportunity to ask questions and solve problems with the help of the group and the provider team. Group participants, given time to choose and explore topics of most interest to them, better understand what is happening to their bodies during pregnancy and feel more prepared for childbirth. Patients who receive care through the CenteringPregnancy model are empowered to manage their health and their baby's health. The experience fosters patient engagement, which is an important strategy to improve population health. Table 1 contains patients' reflections on their experience in the CenteringPregnancy groups.

Population Health

In addition to high ratings for patient satisfaction, participation in the CenteringPregnancy model is associated with significant health benefits for both mothers and newborns. Most striking of these is a reduced rate of preterm birth, one of most challenging and devastating adverse events in maternity care. In a 2007 randomized controlled trial, only 9.8% of women assigned to group prenatal care had a preterm birth compared with 13.8% of women in individual prenatal care, representing a 33% risk reduction [7]. Similarly, a 2012 retrospective analysis reported a 47% reduction in preterm birth among women receiving group prenatal care compared with those in traditional care [10]. In both of these studies, disparities in rates of preterm birth between white and black mothers were also significantly reduced. Research is ongoing to determine mechanisms for these significant outcomes and to understand the full impact of delivering prenatal care using the CenteringPregnancy model.

There are myriad additional maternal health benefits associated with this care delivery model, many of which occur after delivery. These benefits may be related to the enhanced preparation for and promotion of activities and behaviors important to women's health that comprise this model. For example, several studies have shown increased breastfeeding rates among group prenatal care participants [7, 8, 11, 12]. Increased attendance at postpartum visits among CenteringPregnancy participants, specifically within teen and Latina populations, has also been reported [13, 14]. In addition, Hale and colleagues demonstrated that CenteringPregnancy participants had significantly higher rates of utilization for family-planning services compared with women receiving individual prenatal care (P < .05) [15]. While the total impact of CenteringPregnancy on long-term outcomes for women and families warrants further assessment, it is well established that birth weight and breastfeeding influence health beyond infancy. For babies whose mothers received care through the CenteringPregnancy model, these outcomes may have even longer-term implications for improved health.

Impact on Health Care Costs

The CenteringPregnancy model can result in impressive savings for the health care system, primarily through improved birth outcomes. A recent South Carolina study of the CenteringPregnancy model demonstrated Medicaid savings as a result of reduced rates of preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit stays. Gareau and colleagues found that there was an average savings of $22,667 in health expenditures for every premature birth prevented and an estimated return on investment of nearly $2.3 million, after a $1.7 million investment in the CenteringPregnancy model [16].

Assessment of the cost effectiveness of this model is complicated by the fact that cost, care, and outcomes are realized across both mothers and newborns whose care is shared by multiple providers in both outpatient and inpatient settings (prenatal practice, hospital labor and delivery, and neonatal intensive care unit). Maternity providers who plan to provide care via the CenteringPregnancy model face the cost of training a team of cofacilitators, as well as the challenge of investing in implementation support to guide the systematic transition to providing care in groups.

It is not necessary to hire new staff; however, dedicated staff time is required to manage scheduling and coordination for group visits. Once implemented, CenteringPregnancy visits are billed and reimbursed at the same rates as individual prenatal care appointments, and the model is approximately cost neutral at an average group size of 10–11 women [17]. Despite the improved patient outcomes associated with CenteringPregnancy, the larger health care system realizes the actual cost savings—rather than the practices providing this enhanced prenatal care. Reinvestment of downstream savings could offset the cost of implementing and maintaining the group prenatal care model. Strategies to provide financial support and incentives to start and sustain the CenteringPregnancy model may be important to increasing access to the model.

Provider Experience

CenteringPregnancy reshapes the way clinicians engage with patients and improves their enjoyment and satisfaction in providing care, thereby meeting the fourth criterion of the Quadruple Aim. Providers in a CenteringPregnancy practice have the opportunity to explore the content of most relevance and interest to patients in a fun and satisfying way. The repetition that is common in a busy obstetric office is replaced with a model that fosters efficiency and patient engagement. Qualitative analyses of clinical care providers' experiences with the CenteringPregnancy model consistently show that, despite initial concerns about providing prenatal care in a group setting, providers ultimately gain confidence in their facilitation skills and feel rewarded by providing better quality care [18-20]. Table 1 highlights provider and staff comments regarding their experiences with the CenteringPregnancy model.

CenteringPregnancy in North Carolina

The CenteringPregnancy model is growing as a prenatal care option; it is currently available at 19 medical practices in North Carolina and more than 425 locations across the country. CenteringPregnancy is available in a variety of health care settings in North Carolina including health departments, birth centers, private obstetrics and gynecology offices, teaching programs, and military health care providers. As shown in Figure 2, North Carolina practices that offer this model demonstrate improved birth outcomes compared with both statewide and national data [21-23]. Initially offered primarily by midwives, CenteringPregnancy can be directed by any maternity care provider including family physicians, nurse practitioners, or obstetricians. A majority of sites providing CenteringPregnancy in North Carolina have received start-up grant funding through the North Carolina chapter of the March of Dimes, an organization committed to reducing rates of premature birth [24].

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

2015 CenteringPregnancy Outcomes in North Carolina

Most North Carolina CenteringPregnancy sites also benefit from participation in a statewide network, the North Carolina CenteringPregnancy Consortium. Started in 2011 with support from the Northwest Community Care Network of Community Care of North Carolina, this group sponsors 2 meetings each year to support sites committed to providing CenteringPregnancy. Efforts to educate others about the model, to support activities such as seeking grant funding, and to develop best practices have helped sites to overcome barriers to sustainability and to grow in volume.

Maternity and newborn care account for a large proportion of Medicaid costs in North Carolina; premature births are the leading cause of infant death in the state and are responsible for significant spending [25, 26]. The CenteringPregnancy model improves important outcomes for pregnant women and their families. Moreover, this model is associated with significant cost savings to the health care system. Local opportunities exist to support and promote CenteringPregnancy, particularly in areas of training and implementation. Support at the level of large health systems and/or payers could further increase capacity for more North Carolina women to receive prenatal care via this model. Large-scale, rigorous assessment of the outcomes associated with existing CenteringPregnancy practices in North Carolina is warranted to assist stakeholders in fully understanding the potential impact of scaling and spreading this innovative care model.

In 1998, Sharon Rising reflected, “Whenever a new model is being developed, those involved need to be imaginative in its creation. Reorienting thinking from individual to a group model can be difficult and requires creative, imaginative thinking and design” [27]. Health care has entered an era of significant transformation as new value-based models of care delivery are being actively pursued. Patient activation is recognized as a powerful strategy in this effort. In a recent NCMJ article on the value of exceptional patient experience, Joan Wynn notes, “Assuring an exceptional experience means arming people with skills, knowledge, and confidence to participate as fully informed partners in their own care, and this leads to better health outcomes and lower cost of care—the very definition of value” [28]. CenteringPregnancy, a model based on building patient engagement through group care, provides a promising path to meeting the goals of health care's Quadruple Aim.

Acknowledgments

Potential conflicts of interest. C.S. is the current chair of the Centering Health Institute board of directors (volunteer position). S.M. practices at the Centering Health Institute as the practice service manager. J.K.K. has no relevant conflicts of interest.

  • ©2016 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Berwick DM,
    2. Nolan TW,
    3. Whittington J
    The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759-769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Sinsky C
    From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573-576.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Thomas Jefferson University
    Previous Hearst Health Prize competitions: Community Care of North Carolina Awarded the 2016 $100,000 Hearst Health Prize. Thomas Jefferson University website. http://www.jefferson.edu/university/population-health/population-health-innovation/hearst-health-prize/previous-hearst-health-prize.html. Published March 8, 2016. Accessed August 8, 2016.
  4. ↵
    1. Kotelchuck M
    An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(9):1414-1420.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Centering Healthcare Institute
    Overview. Centering Healthcare Institute website. https://www.centeringhealthcare.org/about. Accessed August 2, 2016.
  6. ↵
    1. Centering Healthcare Institute
    Centering Workshops. Centering Health Institute website. https://centeringhealthcare.secure.force.com/WebPortal/CHIOrdersPortal_WorkshopList. Accessed August 5, 2016.
  7. ↵
    1. Ickovics JR,
    2. Kershaw TS,
    3. Westdahl C, et al.
    Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):330-339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Klima C,
    2. Norr K,
    3. Vonderheid S,
    4. Handler A
    Introduction of CenteringPregnancy in a public health clinic. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54(1):27-34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Catling CJ,
    2. Medley N,
    3. Foureur M, et al.
    Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(2):CD007622.
  10. ↵
    1. Picklesimer AH,
    2. Billings D,
    3. Hale N,
    4. Blackhurst D,
    5. Covington-Kolb S
    The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on pre-term birth in a low-income population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):415.e1-7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Zielinski R,
    2. Stork L,
    3. Deibel M,
    4. Kothari CL,
    5. Searing K
    Improving infant and maternal health through CenteringPregnancy: a comparison of maternal health indicators and infant outcomes between women receiving group versus traditional prenatal care. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;4(9):497-505.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Tanner-Smith EE,
    2. Steinka-Fry KT,
    3. Lipsey MW
    A multi-site evaluation of the CenteringPregnancy® programs in Tennessee. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University; 2012. https://my.vanderbilt.edu/emilytannersmith/files/2012/02/Contract19199-GR1030830-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2016.
  13. ↵
    1. Trotman G,
    2. Chhatre G,
    3. Darolia R,
    4. Tefera E,
    5. Damle L,
    6. Gomez-Lobo V
    The effect of Centering Pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care models on improved adolescent health behaviors in the perinatal period. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(5):395-401.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Trudnak TE,
    2. Arboleda E,
    3. Kirby RS,
    4. Perrin K
    Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58(4):396-403.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Hale N,
    2. Picklesimer AH,
    3. Billings DL,
    4. Covington-Kolb S
    The impact of Centering Pregnancy group prenatal care on postpartum family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):50.e1-7.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Gareau S,
    2. Lòpez-De Fede A,
    3. Loudermilk BL, et al.
    Group prenatal care results in Medicaid savings with better outcomes: a propensity score analysis of CenteringPregnancy participation in South Carolina. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(7):1384-1393.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Rowley RA,
    2. Phillips LE,
    3. O'Dell L,
    4. Husseini RE,
    5. Carpino S,
    6. Hartman S
    Group prenatal care: a financial perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(1):1-10.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. McNeil DA,
    2. Vekved M,
    3. Dolan SM,
    4. Siever J,
    5. Horn S,
    6. Tough SC
    A qualitative study of the experience of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care for physicians. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(Suppl 1):S6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Baldwin K,
    2. Phillips G
    Voices along the journey: midwives' perceptions of implementing the CenteringPregnancy model of prenatal care. J Perinat Educ. 2011;20(4):210-217.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Teate A,
    2. Leap N,
    3. Homer CS
    Midwives' experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators: a pilot study in Sydney, Australia. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):e31-36.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. March of Dimes
    2015 Premature Birth Report Card: United States. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes; 2015. www.marchofdimes.org/materials/premature-birth-report-card-united-states.pdf. Accessed August 5, 2016.
    1. March of Dimes Peristats
    North Carolina Quick Facts: Breastfeeding (PRAMS). March of Dimes website. http://www.marchofdimes.org/Peristats/ViewTopic.aspx?reg=37&top=19&lev=0&slev=4. Accessed August, 5 2016.
  21. ↵
    1. March of Dimes Peristats
    North Carolina Quick Facts: Birthweight. March of Dimes website. http://www.marchofdimes.org/Peristats/ViewTopic.aspx?reg=37&top=4&lev=0&slev=4. Accessed August 5, 2016.
  22. ↵
    1. March of Dimes
    North Carolina Chapter website. http://www.marchofdimes.org/northcarolina/. Accessed August 4, 2016.
  23. ↵
    1. Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform
    Maternity care. Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform website. http://www.chqpr.org/maternitycare.html. Accessed August 5, 2016.
  24. ↵
    1. North Carolina Healthy Start Foundation
    Infant Mortality in North Carolina. North Carolina Healthy Start Foundation website. http://www.nchealthystart.org/mortality-in-north-carolina/. Accessed August 5, 2014.
  25. ↵
    1. Rising SS
    Centering pregnancy. An interdisciplinary model of empowerment. J Nurse Midwifery. 1998;43(1):46-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Wynn JD
    The value of exceptional patient experience. N C Med J. 2016;77(4):290-292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

North Carolina Medical Journal: 77 (6)
North Carolina Medical Journal
Vol. 77, Issue 6
November-December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on North Carolina Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CenteringPregnancy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from North Carolina Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the North Carolina Medical Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
CenteringPregnancy
Carmen Strickland, Shannon Merrell, Julienne K. Kirk
North Carolina Medical Journal Nov 2016, 77 (6) 394-397; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.77.6.394

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CenteringPregnancy
Carmen Strickland, Shannon Merrell, Julienne K. Kirk
North Carolina Medical Journal Nov 2016, 77 (6) 394-397; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.77.6.394
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • A Model of Group Prenatal Care
    • Comparing CenteringPregnancy With Traditional Care
    • Quadruple Aim Outcomes
    • CenteringPregnancy in North Carolina
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Creating a Better State of Health for Women
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Policy Forum

  • Breaking the Cycle
  • Breaking the Cycle
  • From Here to There—With a Spring in Our Steps
Show more Policy Forum

INVITED COMMENTARIES AND SIDEBARS

  • Sidebar: Community-driven Approaches to Preventing Overdoses Among American Indians
  • Sidebar: History Shaping the Future: How History Influences Health in North Carolina Native American Communities
  • Sidebar: Impact of Racial Misclassification of Health Data on American Indians in North Carolina
Show more INVITED COMMENTARIES AND SIDEBARS

Similar Articles

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2022 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire