Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
Research ArticlePolicy Forum

La Crosse Encephalitis

A Persistent Arboviral Threat in North Carolina

Brian D. Byrd
North Carolina Medical Journal September 2016, 77 (5) 330-333; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.77.5.330
Brian D. Byrd
associate professor, Environmental Health Sciences Program, College of Health and Human Sciences, Western Carolina University; supervisor, Mosquito and Vector-borne Infectious Disease Laboratory, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bdbyrd@wcu.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases remain a significant cause of economic, social, and health burdens in North Carolina. Although recently overshadowed by emerging threats such as chikungunya virus and Zika virus, La Crosse virus and other endemic arboviruses remain persistent environmental health hazards. Indeed, La Crosse virus, West Nile virus, and Eastern equine encephalitis virus accounted for more than 98% of the reported human arboviral diseases acquired in North Carolina in the past decade. Arbovirus infection is increasingly prevalent in Western North Carolina, with La Crosse encephalitis being endemic in this area. While infections are often asymptomatic and seldom fatal, the long-term neurologic sequelae of La Crosse encephalitis represent a significant burden.

The introduction of the Zika virus and the subsequent epidemics of Zika infection within the Americas represent the latest in a series of emerging infectious diseases that defy geopolitical boundaries and result in substantial economic, social, and health burdens [1]. However, endemic and epizootic arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) remain persistent and significant public health problems. The most commonly reported human arboviral diseases acquired in North Carolina result from neuroinvasive infections caused by La Crosse virus (LACv), West Nile virus, and Eastern equine encephalitis virus (see Figure 1) [2].

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Mosquito-Borne Arboviral Diseases in Humans, North Carolina, 2006–2015

Each of these zoonotic arboviruses has a complex transmission cycle involving an animal reservoir or amplifying host and a variety of mosquito vectors, which presents inherent challenges for surveillance, prevention, and control measures. During the past decade (2006–2015), these 3 arboviruses accounted for more than 98% of the reported mosquito-borne diseases acquired by humans in North Carolina. Strikingly, the majority (84%) of these cases were attributable to La Crosse encephalitis (LACE) caused by LACv infections.

La Crosse Encephalitis

LACE is the most commonly reported pediatric arboviral encephalitis in North America [3]. Clinically apparent LACE is generally characterized by frank encephalitis or altered mental status that may progress to seizures and coma; in rare cases, LACE can cause death [4, 5]. However, serological evidence suggests that most LACv infections are asymptomatic or subclinical, indicating that LACv exposures are grossly underreported [6, 7]. Highly seasonal, the majority of LACE cases have an onset of illness during the months of July through September [3]. Although most LACE cases are reported in children younger than 15 years of age, adult cases are also occasionally recognized [8].

Historically, LACE was primarily reported in the midwestern region of the United States [9]. However, the disease geography appears to have shifted toward the Appalachian region; during the period 2003–2012, 81% of the reported pediatric LACE cases occurred in Ohio, North Carolina, West Virginia, and Tennessee [3]. The western region of North Carolina has long been recognized as an area where LACv and associated diseases are endemic, although reports as early as 1964 described presumptive LACE cases as “California virus encephalitis” [10].

Although the LACE case fatality rate is low (< 1%), long-term neurological sequelae may develop and result in chronic seizures, poor academic performance, impaired mental function, and/or behavioral problems [4, 5, 11]. Thus, LACE is associated with significant social and economic costs. In a study based on interviews with case patients from Western North Carolina (n = 25), Utz and colleagues estimated the direct and indirect medical costs and societal burdens imposed by LACE [11]. Case patients with lifelong neurological sequelae carried the greatest burdens of economic and social impacts of LACE. Notably, the projected costs of long-term medical expenses for these case patients ranged from $48,775 to $3,090,798. Severely affected LACE patients lost 17.5% to 92% of their productive life years to LACE. LACE patients were impaired during 54.8% of the timespan from convalescence until the interview completion date based on calculated disability-adjusted life-year metrics.

La Crosse Virus Transmission Cycle

LACv is maintained in an enzootic focus by transovarial, transstadial, and venereal transmission mechanisms within mosquitoes, and horizontal transmission can occur via small daytime-active mammals (eg, chipmunks and squirrels) that act as amplifying hosts for blood-feeding mosquitoes [12-15]. The eastern tree hole mosquito (Aedes triseriatus) is the primary maintenance vector of LACv. However, 2 invasive species of mosquitoes (Aedes albopictus and Aedes japonicus) are also competent LACv vectors and may play an emerging role in the transmission or maintenance of the virus in some areas where the virus is endemic [16]. These mosquitoes seek hosts during both daylight and twilight periods and will readily obtain blood-meals from humans. All 3 mosquito species lay their eggs in water-filled vessels, including both natural crevices (eg, tree holes and rock pools) and artificial containers (eg, clogged gutters, discarded tires, buckets, and pots). The immature mosquitoes develop as larvae and pupae in these aquatic environments. Thus, the presence of artificial containers within the peridomestic environment may serve to increase mosquito-human biting rates and thus increase disease risk.

La Crosse Encephalitis Risk Factors

Several environmental and behavioral factors are associated with elevated risk of LACE. Known environmental risk factors include the abundance of LACv transmission competent mosquitoes in immature or adult stages, the presence of tree holes or artificial containers, and residence in a rural forested habitat [17-19]. Behavioral risk factors include increased time spent outdoors, failure to use insect repellent or protective clothing, poor residence maintenance (eg, lack of screened windows, lack of air conditioning, or presence of discarded refuse), and lower socioeconomic and educational level. Older house age, deteriorating house condition, and degree of house isolation are also associated with increased risk of LACE. In addition, demographic factors such as male sex and age less than 15 years are historically associated with higher disease incidence, although seroprevalence increases with age [7].

Control and Prevention of La Crosse Encephalitis

Currently, no effective therapies or vaccinations are available to treat or prevent LACv infection. Similarly, evidence is lacking to support the use of mosquito-control measures such as residual barrier sprays, autocidal gravid ovitraps, or lethal ovitraps. Thus, the only currently viable strategy for alleviating morbidity and mortality from LACE is to prevent or reduce human contact with the mosquito vectors. In the context of LACE, disease prevention presently relies on personal protection efforts to prevent mosquito bites. Specifically, at-risk individuals should use insect repellents recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (eg, DEET, picaridin, oil of lemon eucalyptus, and IR3535 per the manufacturers' labeled instructions), wear long-sleeve shirts and pants, and take great care to avoid mosquito contact during peak transmission periods.

Sustained efforts to reduce the abundance of water-filled vessels containing immature mosquitoes (ie, source reduction efforts) often require the assistance of a knowledgeable professional in order to identify cryptic habitats such as tree holes. However, there appears to be a lack of public knowledge of LACE in areas of Western North Carolina where the disease is endemic. Utz and colleagues reported that 20 (80%) of 25 case patient families were not previously aware of the illness [11]. Consequently, there is likely a widespread lack of concern for the public health consequences of this disease, resulting in the underutilization of personal protection or source reduction measures to reduce the risk of LACv infection.

Conclusion

Although most of the current public health response to mosquito-borne diseases in North Carolina remains appropriately focused on the emergence of the Zika virus in the Americas, endemic arboviral diseases such as LACE continue to be important environmental health hazards. Public health policy should thus prioritize sustainable and integrated mosquito-control programs at the local or regional level to address endemic disease while also preparing for emerging threats. Additional research and development efforts to address the paucity of mosquito-control tools for the control and prevention of LACE are urgently needed.

Acknowledgments

Potential conflicts of interest. B.D.B. has no relevant conflicts of interest.

  • ©2016 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jones KE,
    2. Patel NG,
    3. Levy MA, et al.
    Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451(7181):990-993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. US Geological Survey
    Diseasemaps Dynamic Map Application. US Geological Survey website. http://diseasemaps.usgs.gov/mapviewer/. Accessed August 5, 2016.
  3. ↵
    1. Gaensbauer JT,
    2. Lindsey NP,
    3. Messacar K,
    4. Staples JE,
    5. Fischer M
    Neuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States: 2003 to 2012. Pediatrics. 2014;134(3):e642-e650.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. McJunkin JE,
    2. de los Reyes EC,
    3. Irazuzta JE, et al.
    La Crosse encephalitis in children. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):801-807.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. McJunkin JE,
    2. Khan RR,
    3. Tsai TF
    California-La Crosse encephalitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1998;12(1):83-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Rust RS,
    2. Thompson WH,
    3. Matthews CG,
    4. Beaty BJ,
    5. Chun RW
    La Crosse and other forms of California encephalitis. J Child Neurol. 1999;14(1):1-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Szumlas DE,
    2. Apperson CS,
    3. Hartig PC,
    4. Francy DB,
    5. Karabatsos N
    Seroepidemiology of La Crosse virus infection in humans in western North Carolina. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;54(4):332-337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Teleron AL,
    2. Rose BK,
    3. Williams DM,
    4. Kemper SE,
    5. McJunkin JE
    La Crosse encephalitis: an adult case series. Am J Med. 2016;129(8):881-884.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Haddow AD,
    2. Odoi A
    The incidence risk, clustering, and clinical presentation of La Crosse virus infections in the eastern United States, 2003-2007. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kelsey DS,
    2. Smith B
    California virus encephalitis in North Carolina. N C Med J. 1978;39(11):654-656.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Utz JT,
    2. Apperson CS,
    3. MacCormack JN,
    4. Salyers M,
    5. Dietz EJ,
    6. McPherson JT
    Economic and social impacts of La Crosse encephalitis in western North Carolina. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69(5):509-518.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Watts DM,
    2. Morris CD,
    3. Wright RE,
    4. DeFoliart GR,
    5. Hanson RP
    Transmission of La Crosse virus (California encephalitis group) by the mosquito Aedes triseriatus. J Med Entomol. 1972;9(2):125-127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Watts DM,
    2. Pantuwatana S,
    3. DeFoliart GR,
    4. Yuill TM,
    5. Thompson WH
    Transovarial transmission of LaCrosse virus (California encephalitis group) in the mosquito, Aedes triseriatus. Science. 1973;182(4117):1140-1141.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Watts DM,
    2. Thompson WH,
    3. Yuill TM,
    4. DeFoliart GR,
    5. Hanson RP
    Overwintering of La Crosse virus in Aedes triseriatus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974;23(4):694-700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Thompson WH,
    2. Anslow RO,
    3. Hanson RP,
    4. DeFoliart GR
    La Crosse virus isolations from mosquitoes in Wisconsin, 1964-68. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1972;21(2):90-96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Westby KM,
    2. Fritzen C,
    3. Paulsen D,
    4. Poindexter S,
    5. Moncayo AC
    La Crosse encephalitis virus infection in field-collected Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus, and Aedes triseriatus in Tennessee. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2015;31(3):233-241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Erwin PC,
    2. Jones TF,
    3. Gerhardt RR, et al.
    La Crosse encephalitis in Eastern Tennessee: clinical, environmental, and entomological characteristics from a blinded cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(11):1060-1065.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Woodruff BA,
    2. Baron RC,
    3. Tsai TF
    Symptomatic La Crosse virus infections of the central nervous system: a study of risk factors in an endemic area. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136(3):320-327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Nasci RS,
    2. Moore CG,
    3. Biggerstaff BJ, et al.
    La Crosse encephalitis virus habitat associations in Nicholas County, West Virginia. J Med Entomol. 2000;37(4):559-570.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Insect Repellent Use & Safety. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/faq/repellent.html. Updated March 31, 2015. Accessed August 5, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

North Carolina Medical Journal: 77 (5)
North Carolina Medical Journal
Vol. 77, Issue 5
September-October 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on North Carolina Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
La Crosse Encephalitis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from North Carolina Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the North Carolina Medical Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
La Crosse Encephalitis
Brian D. Byrd
North Carolina Medical Journal Sep 2016, 77 (5) 330-333; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.77.5.330

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
La Crosse Encephalitis
Brian D. Byrd
North Carolina Medical Journal Sep 2016, 77 (5) 330-333; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.77.5.330
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • La Crosse Encephalitis
    • La Crosse Virus Transmission Cycle
    • La Crosse Encephalitis Risk Factors
    • Control and Prevention of La Crosse Encephalitis
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Vector-borne Diseases and Climate Change: North Carolina's Policy Should Promote Regional Resilience
  • What Is New in Infectious Diseases?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Policy Forum

  • Breaking the Cycle
  • Breaking the Cycle
  • From Here to There—With a Spring in Our Steps
Show more Policy Forum

INVITED COMMENTARIES AND SIDEBARS

  • Breaking the Cycle
  • Breaking the Cycle
  • From Here to There—With a Spring in Our Steps
Show more INVITED COMMENTARIES AND SIDEBARS

Similar Articles

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2022 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire