Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
North Carolina Medical Journal
  • Other Publications
    • North Carolina Medical Journal
  • My alerts
  • Log in
North Carolina Medical Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Podcast: NC Health Policy Forum
    • Upcoming Scientific Articles
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Advertisers
    • Subscribers
  • About Us
    • About the North Carolina Medical Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • RSS
  • Follow ncmj on Twitter
  • Visit ncmj on Facebook
Research ArticlePolicy Forum

Guidelines and Value-Based Decision Making

An Evolving Role for Payers

Janet L. McCauley
North Carolina Medical Journal September 2015, 76 (4) 243-246; DOI: https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.76.4.243
Janet L. McCauley
senior medical director, Medical and Reimbursement Policy, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina; assistant consulting professor, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Janet.McCauley@bcbsnc.com
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Payers use evidence-based guidelines to promote effective health diagnoses and treatments for their members and to ensure that members are not subject to harmful or wasteful care. Payer guidelines inform coverage, but the content of these guidelines relies on the same evidentiary base as clinical treatment guidelines. Recent strategies to foster value through benefit design and alternative reimbursement methodologies illustrate emerging applications for evidence-based guidelines. The current focus on cost effectiveness within health technology assessment, comparative effectiveness research in collaboration with payers, and transparency around payer evidence assessment could better align payers' interests in evidence-based care with those of other stakeholders. The move to value in health care will depend upon credible clinical evidence to enable informed decision making.

  • ©2015 by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

North Carolina Medical Journal: 76 (4)
North Carolina Medical Journal
Vol. 76, Issue 4
September-October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on North Carolina Medical Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Guidelines and Value-Based Decision Making
(Your Name) has sent you a message from North Carolina Medical Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the North Carolina Medical Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Guidelines and Value-Based Decision Making
Janet L. McCauley
North Carolina Medical Journal Sep 2015, 76 (4) 243-246; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.76.4.243

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Guidelines and Value-Based Decision Making
Janet L. McCauley
North Carolina Medical Journal Sep 2015, 76 (4) 243-246; DOI: 10.18043/ncm.76.4.243
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Basics of Coverage
    • How Guidelines Are Developed and Used by Health Plans
    • Creating Value Out of Evidence: The Move to Cost Effectiveness
    • Future Directions: Payer Roles in Comparative Effectiveness
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Auditing the Auditor: The March of Science and the Need to Refresh Guidelines
  • What, How, and Why
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Policy Forum

  • Health Policy Gets Personal
  • Breaking the Cycle
  • Breaking the Cycle
Show more Policy Forum

INVITED COMMENTARIES AND SIDEBARS

  • Sidebar: Impact of Racial Misclassification of Health Data on American Indians in North Carolina
  • Sidebar: Community-driven Approaches to Preventing Overdoses Among American Indians
  • Sidebar: History Shaping the Future: How History Influences Health in North Carolina Native American Communities
Show more INVITED COMMENTARIES AND SIDEBARS

Similar Articles

About & Contact

  • About the NCMJ
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback

Info for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers

Articles & Alerts

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Get Alerts
  • Upcoming Articles

Additional Content

  • Current NCIOM Task Forces
  • NC Health Data & Resources
  • NCIOM Blog
North Carolina Medical Journal

ISSN: 0029-2559

© 2022 North Carolina Medical Journal

Powered by HighWire