The Benefits and Concerns Surrounding the Automation of Clinical Guidelines

References

1. ↵
   1. Institute of Medicine

   Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2. ↵
   1. McGlynn EA,
   2. Asch SM,
   3. Adams J, et al.

   The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635-2645.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Tierney WM,
   2. Overhage JM,
   3. Takesue BY, et al.

   Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995;2(5):316-322.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Koh HK,
   2. Sebelius KG

   Promoting prevention through the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(14):1296-1299.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. US Preventive Services Task Force

   Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):716-726.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Hunt DL,
   2. Haynes RB,
   3. Hanna SE,
   4. Smith K

   Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1339-1346.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Damiani G,
   2. Pinnarelli L,
   3. Colosimo SC, et al.

   The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):2.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 1. Roshanov PS,
   2. Misra S,
   3. Gerstein HC, et al., CCDSS Systematic Review Team

   Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):92.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Shojania KG,
   2. Jennings A,
   3. Mayhew A,
   4. Ramsay C,
   5. Eccles M,
   6. Grimshaw J

   Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2010;182(5):E216-E225.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    1. Bell LM,
    2. Grundmeier R,
    3. Localio R, et al.

    Electronic health record-based decision support to improve asthma care: a cluster-randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):e770-e777.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Kuhn L,
    2. Reeves K,
    3. Taylor Y, et al.

    Planning for action: the impact of an asthma action plan decision support tool integrated into an electronic health record (EHR) at a large health care system. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(3):382-393.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    1. Jeffery R,
    2. Iserman E,
    3. Haynes R, CDSS Systematic Review Team

    Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2013;30(6):739-745.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Cleveringa FG,
    2. Gorter KJ,
    3. van den Donk M,
    4. van Gijsel J,
    5. Rutten GE

    Computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients' outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(2):180-192.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Holman RR,
    2. Paul SK,
    3. Bethel MA,
    4. Neil HA,
    5. Matthews DR

    Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1565-1576.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Moyer VA, US Preventive Services Task Force

    Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330-338.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Carspecken CW,
    2. Sharek PJ,
    3. Longhurst C,
    4. Pageler NM

    A clinical case of electronic health record drug alert fatigue: consequences for patient outcome. Pediatrics. 2013;131(6):e1970-e1973.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text